Sunday, November 2, 2014

Living and entertaining in the army style


(DGC newsletter Oct)  )


If you visit a senior army officer’s house, you are likely to be awed by the experience. Uniformed guards will salute you smartly at the entrance; a beautiful avenue of bottlebrushes (or other trees) will lead you to the main entrance of the house. There is usually a splendid and well-maintained garden or two outside the home. Once inside, you will find there are several large tastefully furnished rooms. Liveried waiters will hover over you as the hostess tries to make you comfortable. You will get a feeling of grandeur.

However, you have to put in a long career in the army to be eligible for this. You have to start from humble beginnings at the other end of the spectrum and the journey can be very interesting. A junior married officer may start out living like a monk with very simple and basic accommodation. This accommodation fulfils the basic necessities of having a roof over your head and walls around you with little else. As the demarcating walls between adjacent homes can be very thin, one has to whisper all the time or else risk the whole regimental unit knowing your entire family history, secrets and points of disagreement. However, things do get better and better with each rank and after a few years one ends up living on some fantastic properties in the cantonment. 

I distinctly recollect one of the accommodations from my father’s junior officer days. It consisted of three long dark barrack style rooms which we called home. One of these long rooms was our bedroom or rather, a dormitory where all four beds were laid out in parallel. The demarcation between parental area and childrens’ area was three feet of space. The lucky parent and child on either end of this space could swing their legs out of bed more comfortably. As this was deemed a special privilege, my brother and I exchanged beds by rotation. The attached bathroom was large with simple flooring and a very noisy flush. The flush chain was situated quite high (as was the accompanying cistern)  and we both had to draw ourselves up to our full height, which included standing on tiptoe with hands fully outstretched, to pull it down. Along with genetics, these stretching manoeuvres have probably contributed to the impressive heights my brother and I currently enjoy. The deafeningly loud sound of this cistern ensured that everyone knew when someone had visited the bathroom. During dinners in the long drawing room which was adjacent to the bedroom, we had been encouraged to sleep early and try to do the needful for our bladders well before the party commenced. This was because if we used the flush at night, many an interesting story recounted by a guest in the adjoining drawing room had been rudely and dramatically interrupted by a strange loud noise suddenly emanating from somewhere in the house….

Guests were offered the ‘good’ bonafide chairs. There was also the ‘home-made’ furniture in nearly all army homes, which consisted of steel trunks, cleverly covered and concealed with cloth to simulate divans. These were fairly comfortable with all the cloth padding on top, but years of use and abuse (over long distance train luggage wagons) had made some surfaces uneven. Just as the proverbial saying that artificial roses can never emit the smell of real ones, this furniture invariably got ‘caught out’. This was when a guest sat too much to one corner, and the structure rattled because of the unevenness. This was anticipated by army friends whose homes also had plenty of such home - made furniture but it could somewhat unsettle (literally and figuratively) a civilian new to this genre of furniture.

Like the dark rooms, the cupboards were also cavernous and dark as well as dank since the climate was very humid. In an effort to keep out mould, the cupboards had these dim lights in their interiors to render them drier. It made them look a trifle like a hot refrigerator. The light was not bright enough however to identify clothes correctly and one would often pull out seemingly matching clothes only to discover their true colours a while later in the sun. It was a common sight for the guards at the gate to observe family members stepping outside confidently to start the day, then rush back screaming inside and re-emerge a bit later in what appeared to be slightly different clothes. The guards maintained excellent decorum during this drama, not making any expression that would reveal what they were thinking.

The drawing room decorations were predictable (almost universal throughout all the neighbouring army homes) and included several daggers, swords and trophies. These were the traditional gifts when officers visited neighbouring regiments for inspections or other official visits. Civilian friends privately felt that the drawing rooms of their army friends looked more like armouries.

 The army wives had a strong network and not being terribly wealthy, had a keen eye for a good bargain. Loyalty being high, almost everyone ensured that their friends benefitted from the same economical purchases. So there was homogeneity in non-warfare decorations as well, and no matter where you went, you always felt you were somehow in your own home.  The glasses and crockery were the borosil ones available in the army canteens. Since army families were used to the subsidised army canteen fare they were not comfortable spending higher amounts in the civilian markets outside the cantonment.

It was easy to guess what the menu would be when one was invited for a party. This was because the army families were provided free food rations. The rations were, however, hierarchy based. The Commanding officer’s orderly would get the choicest vegetables. Next in turn were the Majors and finally, the poor lieutenant and captains. There was a popular joke doing the rounds that if a dish of potatoes had to be cooked, in the senior officer’s house one potato needed to be cut in two (being so large), a middle level officer’s wife could serve them whole (being nicely medium sized) but a youngsters’ wife had to fuse a few together to make a glob resembling a potato!!

All in all, we had a lovely childhood, progressing over the years from cramped to spacious accommodation, muted speech to full throated yells that could not even be heard at the other end of a palatial house, make-shift to real furniture, homogeneity to taste and style…and finally ending up living in great splendour!!!

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

An officer and a scapegoat

 (Statesman March 2014)


The accident on the Indian Naval ship the Sindhuratna and the aftermath stirred the emotions of many. Two young officers lost their lives and seven sailors were injured in a freak accident while performing their appointed duties sincerely. The navy chief took moral responsibility and resigned. All the people involved suffered, some tragically. Their families, well-wishers and countrymen felt very disturbed by what had happened.

This incident has served to highlight the jarring disparity between the thoughts and feelings of the leaders and the led. Young people who join the armed services are typically idealistic and brave, with high integrity and high institutional loyalty. Their political leaders seem to take their fine feelings and their lives for granted.

 There is an example from Mohammed Bin Tughlaq’s reign where the peasants who were forced to pay taxes despite having suffered famine just ran away and hid in the forests. Agriculture came to a standstill. There may come a time when people do not feel safe enough to encourage their children to join the services if good quality leadership is not provided at the very top of the command chain.

From what we read and hear it becomes quite apparent that some old navy vessels are in a worn down condition and some outright unsafe. Some of the spare parts are of such an antiquated vintage that they are not manufactured any more. Procurement of parts or vessels has not been given the expert consideration it deserves. Expecting sailors to commandeer unsafe ships is callous.

Procurement and repair of naval vessels to my mind should be the sole prerogative of senior naval officers and should not be left to beaurocrats or politicians. Someone who has spent a lifetime knowing the ins and outs of vessels clearly has a better perspective.  Officers who have reached senior positions have passed rigorous boards at several levels and have the capability and the intelligence to handle big decisions themselves.

The current hierarchy which puts most of the decision making in the hands of the minister and beaurocrats holding the defence portfolio does not seem to be working too well. The navy service professionals spend most of their time in work related tasks, but increasingly, their political masters are burdened with political turmoils leaving less time for understanding the finer intricacies of naval functioning.

Immediate and corrective steps should be taken in view of this incident. An urgent evaluation of all vessels by technically competent personnel and the ones declared unfit should be condemned. No personnel should be allowed to be on board an unfit vessel.

The services and their officers have always enjoyed a fine reputation and enviable traditions. Officers have a well- deserved special aura about them as they are brave people of high integrity who give a lot and ask for very little in return. It is extremely demoralising for them when they are treated like cannon fodder and their safety disregarded. It is also a sad culmination, when an officer by dint of hard work and capability reaches the rank of chief, only to be made a scapegoat for the inefficiencies of others. I feel our officers command and deserve far far greater respect than that.



The accident on the Indian Naval ship the Sindhuratna and the aftermath stirred the emotions of many. Two young officers lost their lives and seven sailors were injured in a freak accident while performing their appointed duties sincerely. The navy chief took moral responsibility and resigned. All the people involved suffered, some tragically. Their families, well-wishers and countrymen felt very disturbed by what had happened.

This incident has served to highlight the jarring disparity between the thoughts and feelings of the leaders and the led. Young people who join the armed services are typically idealistic and brave, with high integrity and high institutional loyalty. Their political leaders seem to take their fine feelings and their lives for granted.

 There is an example from Mohammed Bin Tughlaq’s reign where the peasants who were forced to pay taxes despite having suffered famine just ran away and hid in the forests. Agriculture came to a standstill. There may come a time when people do not feel safe enough to encourage their children to join the services if good quality leadership is not provided at the very top of the command chain.

From what we read and hear it becomes quite apparent that some old navy vessels are in a worn down condition and some outright unsafe. Some of the spare parts are of such an antiquated vintage that they are not manufactured any more. Procurement of parts or vessels has not been given the expert consideration it deserves. Expecting sailors to commandeer unsafe ships is callous.

Procurement and repair of naval vessels to my mind should be the sole prerogative of senior naval officers and should not be left to beaurocrats or politicians. Someone who has spent a lifetime knowing the ins and outs of vessels clearly has a better perspective.  Officers who have reached senior positions have passed rigorous boards at several levels and have the capability and the intelligence to handle big decisions themselves.

The current hierarchy which puts most of the decision making in the hands of the minister and beaurocrats holding the defence portfolio does not seem to be working too well. The navy service professionals spend most of their time in work related tasks, but increasingly, their political masters are burdened with political turmoils leaving less time for understanding the finer intricacies of naval functioning.

Immediate and corrective steps should be taken in view of this incident. An urgent evaluation of all vessels by technically competent personnel and the ones declared unfit should be condemned. No personnel should be allowed to be on board an unfit vessel.

The services and their officers have always enjoyed a fine reputation and enviable traditions. Officers have a well- deserved special aura about them as they are brave people of high integrity who give a lot and ask for very little in return. It is extremely demoralising for them when they are treated like cannon fodder and their safety disregarded. It is also a sad culmination, when an officer by dint of hard work and capability reaches the rank of chief, only to be made a scapegoat for the inefficiencies of others. I feel our officers command and deserve far far greater respect than that.